BLANKENSHIP v. WHITE et al
ANDREW J. BLANKENSHIP |
WHITE and KRULL |
1:2022cv01891 |
September 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
James R Sweeney |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RESPONSE, re #4 Notice of Deficiency, filed by Plaintiff ANDREW J. BLANKENSHIP. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDC) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Compliance Submission of Signed Complaint, filed by Plaintiff ANDREW J. BLANKENSHIP (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JDC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through November 7, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ANDREW J. BLANKENSHIP. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by ANDREW J. BLANKENSHIP. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JRT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.