VAUGHN v. CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC.
| JAMES VAUGHN |
| CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC. doing business as CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. and CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. |
| 1:2022cv01938 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER directing filing of documents authorizing dismissal within 30 days of the date of this entry. All pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences, and trial, if any, are VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 11/4/2022.(CBU)
|
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. identifying Corporate Parent CCS Financial Services, Inc. for CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC... (Schwartz, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. (RAGS) (DWH) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Michael Schwartz on behalf of Defendant CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.. (Schwartz, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC., re #1 Complaint, #7 Return of Service. (Schwartz, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service, filed by JAMES VAUGHN. CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. served on 10/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service)(Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (DWH) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. (DWH) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.. (Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) CLERK'S NOTICE - The plaintiff has tendered a summons that is not in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a)(1)(B), which requires a summons be directed to the defendant. Plaintiff has tendered a summons directed to C T Corporation System - which is not named as a defendant in this case. The Clerk cannot issue a summons that is not properly completed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(b). Plaintiff is directed to resubmit a properly completed summons for issuance. (PKP) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff JAMES VAUGHN. (Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., filed by JAMES VAUGHN. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7304662) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2 - The January 6, 2022, and January 8, 2022, letters sent to Defendant, #3 Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A - The August 5, 2022, dunning letter sent by Defendant, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
