COLEMAN v. MYERS
| MICHALE ANGELO COLEMAN |
| MATTHEW MYERS |
| 1:2022cv01960 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLOSED FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters final judgment. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/3/2022. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH) |
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AS DUPLICATIVE - This case involves the same claims and parties as those in Coleman v. Myers, 1:22-cv-1883-JRS-DML, filed in this court on September 23, 2022. There is no reason for duplicative lawsuits which drain scarce judicial resources. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. Mr. Coleman's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , and motion for magistrate judge, dkt. #4 , are denied as moot. The Court notes this is not Mr. Coleman's first duplicative action recently brought in this Court. See Coleman v. Myers, No. 1:22-cv-2033-RLY-MJD, dkt. 6 (S.D. Ind. Oct. 25, 2022) (dismissing action as duplicative); Coleman v. Myers, No. 1:22-cv-1942-TWP-TAB, dkt. 13 (S.D. Ind. Oct. 21, 2022) (same). This practice gives no benefit to Mr. Coleman, and further duplicative actions may result in sanctions. Final judgment shall now issue (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/3/2022. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
| Filing 4 MOTION FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANGELO COLEMAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DRB) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANGELO COLEMAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DRB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANGELO COLEMAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MATTHEW MYERS, filed by MICHAEL ANGELO COLEMAN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DRB) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/5/2022: #2 Proposed Summons) (DRB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: COLEMAN v. MYERS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHALE ANGELO COLEMAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MATTHEW MYERS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
