CLINE v. SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC,
NICHOLAS CLINE |
SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC, |
1:2022cv02020 |
October 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig Carley Marchiando on behalf of Plaintiff NICHOLAS CLINE. (Marchiando, Craig) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Leonard A Bennett on behalf of Plaintiff NICHOLAS CLINE. (Bennett, Leonard) |
Filing 17 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (AKH) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC,.(Kern, Joseph) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER-TELEPHONIC Initial Pretrial Conference set for 1/5/2023 at 2:00 PM (Eastern) before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") no fewer than seven days before the pretrial conference. Unless the parties agree there are compelling reasons for a departure, the CMP shall be in the format set forth in the model CMP found on the Court's website (www.insd.uscourts.gov). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/2/2022.(CBU) |
Filing 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why these actions should not be consolidated. Show Cause Response due by 12/16/2022 (1:22-cv-2021). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/2/2022.(CBU) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC,. (Kalas, Jennifer) |
Filing 12 ORDER - This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Agreed Motion for Enlargement of Time. [Dkt. 10.] Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), all unopposed initial enlargements of time to respond to a pleading or discovery request are limited to 28 days and must be obtained by filing a notice of enlargement of time, not a motion. The notice must include, among other things, the original deadline and a statement confirming that the extension does not exceed 28 days, which Defendant's motion fails to include. Accordingly, Defendant's motion Dkt. #10 is DENIED. Defendant is instructed to immediately file a proper Notice of Enlargement in compliance with the Local Rule, even if Defendant's deadline for doing so has passed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/1/2022. (CKM) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph D. Kern on behalf of Defendant SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC,. (Kern, Joseph) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to 12/28/2022 to Respond to Complaint, filed by Defendant SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC,. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kalas, Jennifer) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Jay Kalas on behalf of Defendant SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC,. (Kalas, Jennifer) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Leonard A. Bennett for NICHOLAS CLINE added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 11/16/2022. (SWM) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Craig Carley Marchiando for NICHOLAS CLINE added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 11/15/2022. (SWM) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Attorney(s) Leonard A. Bennett to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7371016), filed by Plaintiff NICHOLAS CLINE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Bennett, Leonard) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Attorney(s) Craig Carley Marchiando to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7368616), filed by Plaintiff NICHOLAS CLINE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Certificte of Good Standing)(Marchiando, Craig) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC. (DJH) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Duran Keller on behalf of Plaintiff NICHOLAS CLINE. (Keller, Duran) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC,, filed by NICHOLAS CLINE. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7324804) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons to Security Credit Services, LLC)(Keller, Duran) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CLINE v. SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC, | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS CLINE | |
Represented By: | Duran Keller |
Represented By: | Craig Carley Marchiando |
Represented By: | Leonard A Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC, | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Jay Kalas |
Represented By: | Joseph D. Kern |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.