MURATI v. JADDOU et al
| XHEVAT MURATI |
| UR JADDOU and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS |
| 1:2022cv02057 |
| October 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| James R Sweeney |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number (1:22-cv-02057-JRS-KMB), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (JD) |
| Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to USA - UR JADDOU and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Scott Kriezelman on behalf of Plaintiff XHEVAT MURATI. (Kriezelman, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for Writ of Mandamus against UR JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, filed by XHEVAT MURATI. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7333239) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons)(Kriezelman, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
