GARRIGUS v. NACHI AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff: DOLORES GARRIGUS
Defendant: NACHI AMERICA, INC.
Case Number: 1:2022cv02069
Filed: October 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2022 Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by NACHI AMERICA, INC..(Siepman, Kenneth)
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - The above case is hereby assigned for an INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on January 19, 2023 at 11:30 a.m., Indianapolis Time (EST), TELEPHONIC, before the Honorable Matthew P. Brookman, United States Magistrate Judge. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 12/06/2022.(AAS)
November 28, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Kenneth B. Siepman hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Siepman, Kenneth)
November 23, 2022 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by NACHI AMERICA, INC.. (Siepman, Kenneth)
November 23, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re, filed by Defendant NACHI AMERICA, INC.. (Siepman, Kenneth)
November 23, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth B. Siepman on behalf of Defendant NACHI AMERICA, INC.. (Siepman, Kenneth)
November 10, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by DOLORES GARRIGUS. NACHI AMERICA, INC. served on 10/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Cummings, Paul)
October 26, 2022 Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR)
October 26, 2022 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB)
October 26, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to NACHI AMERICA, INC.. (DRB)
October 25, 2022 Filing 3 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to NACHI AMERICA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cummings, Paul)
October 25, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul J. Cummings on behalf of Plaintiff DOLORES GARRIGUS. (Cummings, Paul)
October 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Request for Jury Trial against NACHI AMERICA, INC., filed by DOLORES GARRIGUS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7338597) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Cummings, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GARRIGUS v. NACHI AMERICA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DOLORES GARRIGUS
Represented By: Paul J. Cummings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NACHI AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Kenneth B. Siepman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?