CROSSEN v. MARTOCCIA et al
| CHERI D. CROSSEN |
| JOHN MARTOCCIA, TYLER STILLABOWER, HALEY HOLDRITH, LYDIA JOHN, JOSHUA HONSEL, JAMES GREENLEE and ASHLEY MCDANIELS |
| 1:2022cv02081 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through January 19, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/21/2022: #1 form motion for IFP) (MEH). |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned by US Postal Service as damaged mail occurred during handling in the postal service (original envelope not included) re #5 Notice of Deficiency sent to CHERI D. CROSSEN. (Attachments: #1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY and Form Motion for IFP) (DWH) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through December 14, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (Attachments: #1 Form Motion for IFP) (MEH) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by CHERI D. CROSSEN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DWH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAMES GREENLEE, HALEY HOLDRITH, JOSHUA HONSEL, LYDIA JOHN, JOHN MARTOCCIA, ASHLEY MCDANIELS, TYLER STILLABOWER, filed by CHERI D. CROSSEN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Bartholomew County Jail Grievance Form, #2 Exhibit 2 Appeal, #3 Exhibit 3 Bartholomew County Jail Grievance Form, #4 Exhibit 4 Bartholomew County Jail Grievance Form, #5 Exhibit 5 Bartholomew County Jail Grievance Form, #6 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
