CRISS JR v. DURANT et al
TERRY LEE CRISS JR |
DAVE DURANT and DANA PARKER |
1:2022cv02162 |
November 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER ADDRESSING FILING FEE AND DIRECTING PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE: Mr. Criss filed his petition without paying the filing fee or demonstrating that he lacked the ability to do so. Therefore, Mr. Criss shall have through January 30, 2023, to pay the $5.00 filing fee or to file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Mr. Criss shall have through January 30, 2023, to show cause why his 2241 petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust his available state court remedies, or in the alternative, why it should not be dismissed because his status as a pretrial detainee has changed. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases (applicable to 2241 petitions pursuant to Rule 1(b)); Jackson, 796 F.3d at 842-843. See Order for details. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/6/2023. Copy mailed per distribution list. (LF) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by TERRY LEE CRISS JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.