MEYERS v. PORTER
| KEVIN MEYERS |
| YVONNE PORTER |
| 1:2022cv02271 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Order on In Forma Pauperis Status - The plaintiff shall have through February 14, 2023, to comply with the Court's previous order or to explain why doing so is not possible. The failure to do so by this date will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 1/19/23.(JRB)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through December 30, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/2/2022: #1 form motion for IFP) (MEH). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Northern; Case Number 3:22-cv-00960. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 11/22/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 11/23/2022.]
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Yvonne Porter, filed by Kevin Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Meyers)(kmt) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 11/23/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MEYERS v. PORTER | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KEVIN MEYERS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: YVONNE PORTER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
