MANCHIKALAPUDI v. AMERICAN RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
| DILEEP MANCHIKALAPUDI |
| AMERICAN RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. |
| 1:2022cv02387 |
| December 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER - The Court has been advised by counsel that a settlement has been reached in this action. Therefore, all pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences and trial, if any, are VACATED. IT IS ORDERED that within forty-five days of this date, counsel for the plaintiff shall file a motion to dismiss this cause or a stipulation of dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 1/10/2023.(SWM)
|
| Filing 10 RETURN of Service, filed by DILEEP MANCHIKALAPUDI. AMERICAN RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. served on 12/22/2022. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 9 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR) |
| Filing 8 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to AMERICAN RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. (DJH) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven James Halbert on behalf of Plaintiff DILEEP MANCHIKALAPUDI. (Halbert, Steven) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Angie K. Robertson on behalf of Plaintiff DILEEP MANCHIKALAPUDI. (Robertson, Angie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary E. Philipps on behalf of Plaintiff DILEEP MANCHIKALAPUDI. (Philipps, Mary) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Philipps on behalf of Plaintiff DILEEP MANCHIKALAPUDI. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMERICAN RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., filed by DILEEP MANCHIKALAPUDI. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7409252) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Indiana Secretary of State Corporate Info, #2 Exhibit B - Collection Email, #3 Exhibit C - Attorney Rep/dispute/Verification with Response, #4 Exhibit D - 2nd Collection Email, #5 Exhibit E - Attorney 2nd Rep/Dispute Letter, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Proposed Summons)(Philipps, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MANCHIKALAPUDI v. AMERICAN RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DILEEP MANCHIKALAPUDI | |
| Represented By: | Angie K. Robertson |
| Represented By: | Steven James Halbert |
| Represented By: | Mary E. Philipps |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AMERICAN RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
