MILAM v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION et al
Jefferson Milam |
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC, CORTEVA, INC. and NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC. |
1:2022cv02410 |
December 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mario Garcia |
Richard L Young |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER - Granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond; Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta CropProtection, LLC, Corteva, Inc. and Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. be granted an extension of time such that Defendants' response to Plaintiff's Complaint is now due on a date following the resolution of the transfer motion pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, consistent with the Court's order in the Related Consolidated Action, In re Crop Protection Products Loyalty Program Agreements Antirust Litigation, 1:22- cv-01976- RLY-MG (Jan. 13, 2023), ECF No. 94. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 2/3/2023. (CKM) |
Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to pending the JPML's forthcoming decision on transfer motion in which to #2 Complaint (Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint), filed by Defendants CORTEVA, INC., NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC., SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Maley, John) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by John R. Maley on behalf of Defendant CORTEVA, INC.. (Maley, John) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, filed by Defendants CORTEVA, INC., NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC., SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (Marriott, David) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge Richard L. Young and Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. Judge James R. Sweeney II, Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:22-cv-02410-RLY-MG, on all future filings in this matter. (DRB) |
Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Clerk is directed to reassign case to Judge Richard L. Young and Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia for all further proceedings. This case is related to 1:22-cv-1976. Judge James R. Sweeney II and Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/22/2022. (SNB) |
Filing 8 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Related Actions, filed by Plaintiff JEFFERSON MILAM (Young, John) |
Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CORTEVA, INC., NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC., SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC. (DRB) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by John P. Young on behalf of Plaintiff Jefferson Milam. (Young, John) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CORTEVA, INC., NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC., SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC, filed by Jefferson Milam. (AINSDC-7416391 $402 paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Young, John) Modified on 12/16/2022 - updated payment information (RSF). |
Filing 1 REPORT Notice of Related Actions by Jefferson Milam. (Young, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.