JONES v. MRS BPO A/K/A MRS ASSOCIATES
| TYPREE JONES |
| MRS BPO, MRS ASSOCIATES and MRS BPO, A/K/A MRS ASSOCIATES |
| 1:2022cv02451 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by TYPREE JONES. MRS BPO, A/K/A MRS ASSOCIATES served on 1/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MRS BPO, A/K/A MRS ASSOCIATES. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff TYPREE JONES. (Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against MRS BPO, filed by TYPREE JONES. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7425464) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2 - The April 12, 2022, and April 14, 2022, letters sent by Plaintiff's Counsel, #3 Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A - Relevant pages of Plaintiff's June 13, 2022, Experian credit report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
