KABA et al v. AEROTEK, INC et al
Mohamed Kaba and Abdul Lee |
Aerotek, Inc, Labcorp, AEROTEK, INC. and LABCORP DRUG DEVELOPMENT INC. |
1:2023cv00084 |
January 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER granting Defendant Aerotek, Inc's #15 Motion to Compel Arbitration - This matter is stayed pending resolution in the arbitration proceedings, provided the Court will, if necessary, resolve the attorneys' fee issue. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 4/4/2023. (SWM) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting Parties' #27 Joint Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Aerotek's Motion to Compel Arbitration - It is therefore ordered that this lawsuit is stayed, and all deadlines are vacated, pending the Court's ruling on Defendant Aerotek, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss, or Alternatively, to Stay [Dkt. 15]. The March 27, 2023, initial pretrial conference is vacated. It is further ordered that, should the Court issue an order denying Aerotek's request to compel arbitration, the parties shall file a proposed case management plan on or before 14 days after such order issues. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 3/23/2023.(SWM) |
Filing 27 Joint MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Dkt. #15 , filed by Plaintiffs MOHAMED KABA, ABDUL LEE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ellis, Benjamin) Modified on 3/23/2023 - Linked to dkt. 15 (JSR). |
Filing 26 REPLY in Support of Motion re #15 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss, or alternatively, to Stay , filed by Defendant AEROTEK, INC.. (Scroggins, Andrew) |
Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss, or alternatively, to Stay , filed by Plaintiffs MOHAMED KABA, ABDUL LEE. (Ellis, Benjamin) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss, or alternatively, to Stay, filed by Defendant AEROTEK, INC.. (Scroggins, Andrew) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , filed by LABCORP DRUG DEVELOPMENT INC..(Gessner, Jaclyn) |
Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER:Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 3/27/2023 09:00 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. See Order for additional information Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 2/15/2023.(SWM) |
Filing 12 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by LABCORP DRUG DEVELOPMENT INC. identifying Corporate Parent LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS for LABCORP DRUG DEVELOPMENT INC... (Gessner, Jaclyn) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendants AEROTEK, INC., LABCORP DRUG DEVELOPMENT INC.. (Gessner, Jaclyn) |
Filing 10 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR) |
Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
Filing 8 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
Filing 7 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Aerotek, Inc identifying Corporate Parent Allegis Group, Inc. for Aerotek, Inc.. (Scroggins, Andrew) |
Filing 6 CONSENT to Notice of Removal by Labcorp. (Gessner, Jaclyn) |
Filing 5 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Labcorp identifying Other Affiliate LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS for Labcorp.. (Gessner, Jaclyn) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jaclyn Susan Gessner on behalf of Defendant Labcorp. (Gessner, Jaclyn) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew L. Scroggins on behalf of Defendant Aerotek, Inc. (Scroggins, Andrew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET , filed by Defendant Aerotek, Inc. (Scroggins, Andrew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D04-2212-CT-042652, filed by Aerotek, Inc. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7457653) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Scroggins, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.