SHARP v. KIJAKAZI
Plaintiff: WHITNEY L. SHARP
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Case Number: 1:2023cv00103
Filed: January 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE - Plaintiff seeks judicial review of Defendant Commissioner's denial of Plaintiff's claim for Social Security benefits based on disability. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the Court now enters the following orders. A. Briefing Schedule - Within fifty-six (56) days of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a brief in support of the complaint. Within fifty-six (56) days after service of Plaintiff's brief, Defendant shall file a brief in response. Within twenty-eight (28) days after service of Defendant's opposition brief, Plaintiff will file his/her reply brief, if any (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/17/2023. (DWH)
March 16, 2023 Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record of Social Security Administration, by KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Attachments: #1 court transcript index, #2 administrative records, #3 payment records, #4 jurisdictional records, #5 non disability records, #6 disability records, #7 medical records)(Wierenga, Julian)
February 1, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Wierenga, Julian)
January 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ON MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Dkt. #3 ; see 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). While in forma pauperis status allows Plaintiff to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, she remains liable for the full fees. Rosas v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago, 748 F. App'x 64, 65 (7th Cir. 2019) ("Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), a district court may allow a litigant to proceed 'without prepayment of fees,'... but not without ever paying fees."). No payment is due at this time. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/19/2023. (DWH)
January 19, 2023 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
January 18, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff WHITNEY L. SHARP. (Wold, Kirsten)
January 18, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kirsten Elaine Wold on behalf of Plaintiff WHITNEY L. SHARP. (Wold, Kirsten)
January 18, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KILOLO KIJAKAZI, filed by WHITNEY L. SHARP. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wold, Kirsten)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHARP v. KIJAKAZI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WHITNEY L. SHARP
Represented By: Kirsten Elaine Wold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Represented By: Julian Clifford Wierenga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?