WELKA v. LANCASTER et al
ROBERT WELKA |
JAMES F. LANCASTER and MIDWEST LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, LTD. |
1:2023cv00133 |
January 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
M Kendra Klump |
Richard L Young |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Exhibit List Preliminary, filed by Plaintiff ROBERT WELKA, Witness List Preliminary, filed by Plaintiff ROBERT WELKA. (Mendiondo, Adrian) |
Filing 15 ORDER REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDERS. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 3/9/2023.(SWM) |
Filing 14 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 3/9/2023.(SWM) |
Filing 13 ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS AMENDED. Discovery due by 5/13/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 3/9/2023.(SWM) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER for Initial Pretrial Conference held before Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 3/8/2023. Telephonic Status Conference set for 6/5/2023 at 3:00 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump. See Minute Order for further information. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump. (BAS) |
Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff ROBERT WELKA . (Mendiondo, Adrian) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Adrian Mendiondo on behalf of Plaintiff ROBERT WELKA. (Mendiondo, Adrian) |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER:Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 3/8/2023 02:00 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the court's expectations for the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 2/10/2023.(SWM) |
Filing 7 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand , filed by JAMES F. LANCASTER, MIDWEST LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, LTD..(Gaston, Keith) |
Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Bruce D. Jones on behalf of Defendants JAMES F. LANCASTER, MIDWEST LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, LTD.. (Jones, Bruce) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley M. Owen on behalf of Defendants JAMES F. LANCASTER, MIDWEST LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, LTD.. (Owen, Bradley) |
Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by MIDWEST LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, LTD. identifying Corporate Parent Schneider Dedicated Services, Inc., Corporate Parent Schneider National Inc. for MIDWEST LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, LTD... (Gaston, Keith) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Keith A. Gaston on behalf of Defendants JAMES F. LANCASTER, MIDWEST LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, LTD.. (Gaston, Keith) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D13-2212-CT-042668, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7469828) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record (Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages, Appearance for Plaintiff, Summons to Defendant Lancaster, Summons to Midwest Logistics Systems, Ltd., Defendants' Notice of Automatic Enlargement of Time Within Which to Move or Plead, Defendants' Appearance, Affidavit of Service as to Defendant Lancaster), #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Amount in Controversy, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gaston, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.