MARTY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
| CARL MARTY |
| NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and FRITO-LAY, INC. |
| 1:2023cv00134 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Designation of Evidence re #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Defendant FRITO-LAY, INC.. (Hopkins, Lizabeth) |
| Filing 18 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Defendant FRITO-LAY, INC.. (Hopkins, Lizabeth) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Defendant FRITO-LAY, INC.. (Hopkins, Lizabeth) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against FRITO-LAY, INC., filed by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.(Humble, Matthew) |
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER:Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/24/2023 02:00 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. The parties themselves may participate at their option. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties are ordered to confer prior to the initial pretrial conference and prepare a proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 2/6/2023.(SWM)
|
| Filing 14 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by FRITO-LAY, INC.. (Hopkins, Lizabeth) |
| Filing 13 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DWH) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by FRITO-LAY, INC..(Hopkins, Lizabeth) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Lizabeth R. Hopkins on behalf of Defendant FRITO-LAY, INC.. (Hopkins, Lizabeth) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Robert E. Harrington, III hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Harrington, Robert) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Michael Humble on behalf of Defendant NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Humble, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Loftus, Barry) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Loftus, Barry) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry L. Loftus on behalf of Defendant NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Loftus, Barry) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert E. Harrington, III on behalf of Plaintiff CARL MARTY. (Harrington, Robert) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to FRITO-LAY, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Carl Marty. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7469986) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Norfolk Southern Railway Company, #3 Proposed Summons Frito-Lay, Inc.)(Harrington, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
