BRIER v. DAUSS et al
Plaintiff: JACOB BRIER
Defendant: DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Case Number: 1:2023cv00173
Filed: January 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Kellie M Barr
Referring Judge: Matthew P Brookman
2 Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING FILING FEE - Mr. Brier shall have one final opportunity, through April 3, 2023, to pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action or to file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to take either action within the extended time permitted will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning or opportunity to show cause. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 3/6/2023.(SWM)
February 15, 2023 Filing 8 Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number (1:23-cv-00173-JPH-KMB), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (Albertson, Steven)
February 2, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through March 3, 2023, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Attachments: #1 Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (JRT)
February 1, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH)
January 31, 2023 Filing 5 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JACOB BRIER located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JACOB BRIER to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AAS)
January 27, 2023 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB)
January 27, 2023 Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB)
January 26, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER, DAUSS, filed by JACOB BRIER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit)(DRB) (Main Document 2 replaced on 1/27/2023) (DRB). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/27/2023: #1 Exhibit) (DRB). Modified on 1/27/2023 (DRB). REPLACED PREVIOUS UPLOAD WITH CORRECT FILE
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SEVER CLAIMS. The clerk is directed to open one new civil action in the Indianapolis Division consistent with the following:1) The plaintiff will be Jacob Brier.2) The defendants in the new action will be Dr. Dauss and Centurion.3) The Nature of the Suit will be 555.4) The Cause of Action will be 42:1983pr.5)The clerk is directed to re-docket the complaint (docket 2) and this Orderin the new action.6)Pursuant to Local Rule 40-1(e) of the Southern District of Indiana, theclerk shall DIRECTLY REASSIGN this new civil action to Judge James P. Hanlon and Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman for all further proceedings.7)The clerk shall associate this action with the new civil action.Mr. Brier will be required to pay the $402.00 filing fee or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 01/26/2023.(DRB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRIER v. DAUSS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JACOB BRIER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAUSS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?