RUBY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RUBEN RUBY |
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION |
1:2023cv00231 |
February 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mario Garcia |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint , Affirmative Defenses, and Jury Demand, filed by INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.(Jimenez, Gustavo) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. (Jimenez, Gustavo) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - The above case is hereby assigned for an INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 2023 at 2:30 p.m., Indianapolis Time (EST), TELEPHONIC, before the Honorable Mario Garcia, United States Magistrate Judge. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 2/23/2023. (JSR) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Michelle Davis on behalf of Defendant INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. (Davis, Stephanie) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Gustavo Angel Jimenez on behalf of Defendant INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. (Jimenez, Gustavo) |
Filing 8 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by RUBEN RUBY. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION served on 2/15/2023. (Guffey, Sarah) |
Filing 7 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR) |
Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. (DJH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Dutkanych, III on behalf of Plaintiff RUBEN RUBY. (Dutkanych, Andrew) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Guffey on behalf of Plaintiff RUBEN RUBY. (Guffey, Sarah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, filed by RUBEN RUBY. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7492282) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Guffey, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: RUBY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RUBEN RUBY | |
Represented By: | Andrew Dutkanych, III |
Represented By: | Sarah Guffey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION | |
Represented By: | Gustavo Angel Jimenez |
Represented By: | Stephanie Michelle Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.