MID-AMERICA MGMT. CORPORATION v. ROBERTS et al
MID-AMERICA MGMT. CORPORATION |
ANDREA ROBERTS and QUANTAVIOUS BROWN |
1:2023cv00343 |
February 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Transfer Letter to the Clerk of the Marion County Small Claims Court County Court. Copies of case documents and docket enclosed. (AKH) |
Filing 12 ORDER REMANDING CASE - This case is REMANDED to Marion County Small Claims Court, Pike Township, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's motion to remand, dkt. #9 , is GRANTED to the extent that the case is remanded to state court. Defendant Andrea Roberts's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. Dkt. #2 . Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. (See Order). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 4/6/2023. (AKH) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE, re #7 Order to Show Cause, filed by Defendant ANDREA ROBERTS. (JDC) |
Filing 10 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by MID-AMERICA MGMT. CORPORATION identifying Corporate Parent NONE for MID-AMERICA MGMT. CORPORATION.. (Merritt-Thrasher, Kathryn) |
Filing 9 First MOTION to Remand , filed by Plaintiff MID-AMERICA MGMT. CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Merritt-Thrasher, Kathryn) |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/13/2023 03:00 PM in room #234, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. If a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") has not yet been filed, the parties shall tender a proposed CMP no less than 3 business days prior to the pretrial conference. See Order for additional information. Copy to Defendants and Attorneys per Distribution List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 3/16/2023.(SWM) Modified on 3/16/2023 to reflect copies mailed to Defendants. (SWM). |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Defendants Andrea Roberts and Quantavious Brown removed this case from Marion County Small Claims Court. Dkt. 1. Because it does not appear that the Court has jurisdiction over this suit, Defendants shall have until April 3, 2023 to show cause why the case should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Order. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/2/2023. Copies mailed per Distribution list. (LF) |
Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 4 Submission of Claim for relief/and restitution filed by Defendant, ANDREA ROBERTS. (DJH) |
Filing 3 Submission filed by Defendant ANDREA ROBERTS. (DJH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Defendant ANDREA ROBERTS. (DJH) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pike Township of Marion County Small Claims Court, case number 49K05-2301-EV-000214, filed by ANDREA ROBERTS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record including Notice of Claim, Month-To-Month Occupancy Agreement, Appearance, Motion for Continuance, Notice to Move, Administrative Notice and Demand For Identification And Credentials Quo Warranto, #3 Operative Complaint)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.