HURST v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
| JACOB HURST |
| WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP. |
| 1:2023cv00363 |
| March 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
JOINT UNIFORM STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER #14 SO ORDERED AND APPROVED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 4/27/2023.(SWM)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER OF REFERENCE - The parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. #16 . This case is, therefore, REFERRED to the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge, The Honorable Mario Garcia, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. If this case is reassigned to a different magistrate judge, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of that reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. This action's case number SHALL be amended as shown above to reflect this referral to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 4/27/2023.(DWH)
|
| Filing 16 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendant WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP. . (Hinen, Macie) |
| Filing 15 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (DWH) |
| Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Protective Order , filed by Defendant WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Joint Uniform Stipulated Protective Order (Exhibit A), #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hinen, Macie) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to Removal, filed by Plaintiff JACOB HURST. (Norman, John) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER - Defendant removed this action to this Court on March 1, 2023, alleging that the Court has diversity jurisdiction over this case. Dkt. 1 at 2-5. Local Rule 81-1(b) provides: Within 30 days after the filing of the notice of removal, every plaintiff who has not filed a motion to remand must file a statement responding to the notice of removal's allegations as to the citizenship of the parties and the amount in controversy. If the plaintiff lacks sufficient information upon which to form a belief about those allegations despite meeting and conferring in good faith with the removing party about them, the plaintiff may so state. More than 30 days have passed since the filing of the notice of removal, yet Plaintiff has not moved to remand or filed a response. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 81-1 by April 24, 202. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 4/10/2023.(DWH)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand , filed by WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP..(Hinen, Macie) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER - Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference is set for 5/3/2023 02:00 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 3/3/2023. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. (CKM)
|
| Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
| Filing 8 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #4055 for filing fee in the amount of $402.00, paid by Macie Hinen. (DRB) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lesley A. Pfleging on behalf of Defendant WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. (Pfleging, Lesley) |
| Filing 5 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. (Hinen, Macie) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. (Hinen, Macie) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendant WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. (Hinen, Macie) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Macie Hinen on behalf of Defendant WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. (Hinen, Macie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Receipt Number 4055 from Hendricks County Superior Court, case number 32D01-2210-CT-000149, filed by WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record Appearance for Plaintiff, Complaint, Summons, Certificate of Issuance of Summons, Appearance for Defendant, Jury Demand, Motion for Time, Order Granting Motion for Time, #3 Supplement State Court Complaint)(Hinen, Macie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HURST v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JACOB HURST | |
| Represented By: | John Douglas Norman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP. | |
| Represented By: | Macie Hinen |
| Represented By: | Lesley A. Pfleging |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
