LESTER et al v. QUIGLEY et al
| LASHAE LESTER, MICHAEL GAITHER and LASHAE LESTER, AS PARENT AND NEXT FRIEND OF MINOR DONALD MCGAHA, III |
| BRIAN S QUIGLEY and FFE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. |
| 1:2023cv00365 |
| March 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. Parties appeared by Counsel on 4/24/2023, for a Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference. Dispositive Motions are not anticipated. Discovery due by 7/1/2024. Telephonic Status Conference set for 10/23/2023 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 4/24/2023.(SWM) Modified on 4/25/2023 (DMB).
|
| Filing 8 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendants FFE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., BRIAN S QUIGLEY . (Hoy, Jason) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - This case is assigned for a telephonic initial pretrial conference before United States Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on April 24, 2023, at 4 p.m. (Eastern Time). Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. The parties shall file the proposed CMP no less than two business days prior to the pretrial conference. Filing of the plan will not automatically vacate the pretrial conference. The conference will remain set unless specifically vacated by the Court, which is unlikely. Plaintiff's counsel shall appear at the pretrial conference prepared to make a settlement proposal if no proposal has yet been made. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 03/20/2023.(AAS)
|
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
| Filing 4 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by FFE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.. (Hoy, Jason) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Keith Phillips on behalf of Defendants FFE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., BRIAN S QUIGLEY. (Phillips, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason J. Hoy on behalf of Defendants FFE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., BRIAN S QUIGLEY. (Hoy, Jason) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D07-2211-CT-039243, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7526836) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants' Requests for Admission, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Appearance, Complaint, Summonses, Certificates of Issuance of Summonses and Certified Mail Returns on behalf of Plaintiffs; Appearance, Motion for Enlargement of Time to answer, Order on Motion for Enlargement of Time to answer, Answer Affirmative Defenses and Demand for Trial byJury, Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant KLLM Transport Services, LLC, and Order of Dismissal as to Defendant KLLM Transport Services, LLC on behalf of Defendants, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Plaintiffs' Complaint, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - State Court docket, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Hoy, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
