WILSON v. WARDEN
Petitioner: JAMES E. WILSON
Respondent: WARDEN
Case Number: 1:2023cv00486
Filed: March 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2023 Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT - The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/4/2023.(AKH)
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING SUCCESSIVE HABEAS PETITION - James E. Wilson, a prisoner at Plainfield Correctional Facility, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, challenging his conviction for attempted murder under Indiana Cause No. 49G02-1111-FA-80777. Mr. Wilson has already challenged this conviction in federal court, and his petition was dismissed with prejudice because it was barred by the statute of limitations. This Court has explained to Mr. Wilson, twice, that he must get permission from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals before bringing any second or successive challenges to his conviction. There is no indication that Mr. Wilson has obtained the Seventh Circuit's permission to file a successive habeas petition. The petition is therefore DISMISSED for lack of JURISDICTION for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. No certificate of appealability shall issue. The clerk is DIRECTED to issue Final Judgment in accordance with this Order. (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/4/2023. (AKH)
March 17, 2023 Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB)
March 17, 2023 Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB)
March 17, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum, filed by Petitioner JAMES E. WILSON. (DRB)
March 17, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner JAMES E. WILSON. (DRB)
March 17, 2023 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JAMES E. WILSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DRB)
March 17, 2023 Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JAMES E. WILSON located at PLAINFIELD CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JAMES E. WILSON to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DRB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILSON v. WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAMES E. WILSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?