WHITLEY v. LANGHORNE et al
Plaintiff: GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY
Defendant: THOMAS B. LANGHORNE, COURIER & PRESS and USA TODAY
Case Number: 1:2023cv00497
Filed: March 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Mario Garcia
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - Plaintiff Gabriel Mathew Whitley, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit and has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Dkt. #2 . That motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has moved to amend his complaint Dkt. #9 , which motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have forty (40) days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint naming all the parties and claims he wishes to assert in this litigation. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/14/2023. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
April 5, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION to Amend, filed by Plaintiff GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY. (JDC)
April 5, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION for Jury Trial, filed by Plaintiff GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY. (JDC)
April 5, 2023 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT by GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY. (JDC)
March 22, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (LDH)
March 22, 2023 Filing 5 ***PLEASE DISREGARD. ENTERED IN ERROR.*** NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (LDH) Modified on 3/22/2023 (LDH).
March 20, 2023 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB)
March 20, 2023 Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB)
March 20, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY. (DRB)
March 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COURIER & PRESS, THOMAS B. LANGHORNE, USA TODAY, filed by GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (DRB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITLEY v. LANGHORNE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS B. LANGHORNE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COURIER & PRESS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA TODAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?