DUFEK v. INDIANA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
SARAH DUFEK |
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION |
1:2023cv00546 |
March 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mario Garcia |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION.(McGowan, Stephanie) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Dutkanych, III on behalf of Plaintiff SARAH DUFEK. (Dutkanych, Andrew) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION. (McGowan, Stephanie) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie V. McGowan on behalf of Defendant INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION. (McGowan, Stephanie) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - The above case is hereby assigned for an INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on FRIDAY, JUNE 9, 2023 at 2:00 p.m., Indianapolis Time (EST), TELEPHONIC, before the Honorable Mario Garcia, United States Magistrate Judge. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 4/17/2023. (JSR) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony W. Overholt on behalf of Defendant INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION. (Overholt, Anthony) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by SARAH DUFEK. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION served on 4/3/2023. (Stultz, Emily) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION. (DRB) |
Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily M Stultz on behalf of Plaintiff SARAH DUFEK. (Stultz, Emily) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, filed by SARAH DUFEK. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7565866) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Stultz, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DUFEK v. INDIANA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SARAH DUFEK | |
Represented By: | Emily M Stultz |
Represented By: | Andrew Dutkanych, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | Anthony W. Overholt |
Represented By: | Stephanie V. McGowan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.