DUFEK v. INDIANA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
Plaintiff: SARAH DUFEK
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2023cv00546
Filed: March 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mario Garcia
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2023 Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION.(McGowan, Stephanie)
April 24, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Dutkanych, III on behalf of Plaintiff SARAH DUFEK. (Dutkanych, Andrew)
April 20, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION. (McGowan, Stephanie)
April 20, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie V. McGowan on behalf of Defendant INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION. (McGowan, Stephanie)
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - The above case is hereby assigned for an INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on FRIDAY, JUNE 9, 2023 at 2:00 p.m., Indianapolis Time (EST), TELEPHONIC, before the Honorable Mario Garcia, United States Magistrate Judge. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 4/17/2023. (JSR)
April 14, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony W. Overholt on behalf of Defendant INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION. (Overholt, Anthony)
April 5, 2023 Filing 6 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by SARAH DUFEK. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION served on 4/3/2023. (Stultz, Emily)
March 30, 2023 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB)
March 30, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION. (DRB)
March 30, 2023 Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB)
March 29, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily M Stultz on behalf of Plaintiff SARAH DUFEK. (Stultz, Emily)
March 29, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, filed by SARAH DUFEK. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7565866) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Stultz, Emily)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DUFEK v. INDIANA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SARAH DUFEK
Represented By: Emily M Stultz
Represented By: Andrew Dutkanych, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
Represented By: Anthony W. Overholt
Represented By: Stephanie V. McGowan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?