MAXWELL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
GREGORY MAXWELL |
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION |
1:2023cv00553 |
March 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
M Kendra Klump |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Christopher Moeller hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Moeller, Christopher) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE To The Notice of Removal's Allegations to the Citizenship of the Parties and the Amount in Controversy, filed by Plaintiff GREGORY MAXWELL. (Lenceski, Amy) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy Lenceski on behalf of Plaintiff GREGORY MAXWELL. (Lenceski, Amy) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by James F. Olds on behalf of Defendants NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Olds, James) |
Filing 14 Amended Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Loftus, Barry) Modified on 4/4/2023 - Updated dkt. text (JSR). |
Filing 13 Amended Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION. (Loftus, Barry) Modified on 4/4/2023 - Updated dkt. text (JSR). |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Filing & Service of Notice of Removal in State Court, filed by Defendants NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, re #1 Notice of Removal. (Loftus, Barry) |
Filing 11 ORDER - Defendants have filed a Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statements, but neither statement sets forth the citizenship of the filing party. Defendants are each ORDERED to file an Amended Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by April 7, 2023 which adequately sets forth the Defendants' citizenship. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/31/2023. (JSR) |
Filing 10 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR) |
Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
Filing 8 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
Filing 7 NSC's ANSWER to Complaint , filed by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION.(Loftus, Barry) |
Filing 6 NSRC's ANSWER to Complaint , filed by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION.(Loftus, Barry) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Heavrin Harrison, III on behalf of Defendant NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION. (Harrison, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION. (Loftus, Barry) |
Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION. (Loftus, Barry) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry L. Loftus on behalf of Defendant NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION. (Loftus, Barry) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Delaware County Circuit Court 3, case number 18C03-2303-CT-000033, filed by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7568270) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 State Court Record Appearance, Complaint & Summons, Certificate of Issuance of summons, Appearance, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Loftus, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.