WHITLEY v. BRAGG
Plaintiff: GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY
Defendant: ALVIN BRAGG
Case Number: 1:2023cv00609
Filed: April 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Matthew P Brookman
2 Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2023 Filing 8 CLOSED JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail). Signed by District Judge Matthew P Brookman on 5/18/2023.(JDC)
May 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE - On April 14, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff Gabriel Whitley's complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). (Docket No. #5 ). Ultimately, the Court found that Mr. Whitley had failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and, thus, the Complaint was subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Whitley was provided through May 12, 2023, by which to show cause why judgment consistent with that Entry should not issue. Mr. Whitley did not respond. Mr. Whitley's claims are therefore DISMISSED for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Final judgment shall issue by separate entry. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail). Signed by District Judge Matthew P Brookman on 5/18/2023.(JDC)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ***PLEASE DISREGARD. DOCKETED IN ERROR*** ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS AMENDED Dispositive Motions due by 3/8/2024. Discovery due by 2/9/2024. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 4/14/23.(JRB) Modified on 4/17/2023 (JRB).
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ON VARIOUS MATTERS - Plaintiff's Non-Prisoner Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee (Docket No. #2 ) is GRANTED. Having screened the Complaint, the Court finds it is subject to dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint by no later than May 12, 2023. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, this action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 4/14/23. (JRB) Modified on 4/14/2023 (JRB).
April 10, 2023 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB)
April 10, 2023 Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB)
April 10, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY. (DRB) (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/11/2023) (AAS).
April 10, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALVIN BRAGG, filed by GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (DRB) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/11/2023) (AAS).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITLEY v. BRAGG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GABRIEL MATHEW WHITLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALVIN BRAGG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?