FRAZIER v. THE HIPHUGGER, LLC
AMY M. FRAZIER and AMY MICHELE FRAZIER |
THE HIPHUGGER, LLC |
1:2023cv00685 |
April 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by AMY MICHELE FRAZIER. (Kondras, Robert) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant The Hiphugger, LLC and Motion for Hearing on Damages, filed by Plaintiff AMY MICHELE FRAZIER. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Robert P. Kondras, Jr., #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kondras, Robert) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by AMY MICHELE FRAZIER. THE HIPHUGGER, LLC served on 4/26/2023. (Kondras, Robert) |
Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to THE HIPHUGGER, LLC. (DJH) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Peter Kondras, Jr on behalf of Plaintiff AMY M. FRAZIER. (Kondras, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE HIPHUGGER, LLC, filed by AMY M. FRAZIER. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7599024) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit 1-Consent to Join by Amy Frazier)(Kondras, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.