ELBAHGA v. GARLAND et al
| MOHAMED A. ELBAHGA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND and UR M. JADDOU |
| 1:2023cv00728 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Mario Garcia |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Proof of Service served on Defendants on 05/02/2023, filed by MOHAMED A. ELBAHGA. (Jung, Se Young) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Se Young Jung for MOHAMED A. ELBAHGA added. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 4/28/23. (JRB)
|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to USA - MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, (DRB) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Attorney(s) Se Young Jung to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7609967), filed by Plaintiff MOHAMED A. ELBAHGA. (Jung, Se Young) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MOHAMED A. ELBAHGA. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7609851) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Summons)(Jung, Se Young) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
