KELORDE v. MAYORKAS et al
Kingebeni Kilaka Kelorde |
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
1:2023cv00795 |
May 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by KINGEBENI KILAKA KELORDE. All Defendants. (Asch, Marc) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Marc Asch for KINGEBENI KILAKA KELORDE added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 5/11/23. (JRB) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (LF) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LF) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Attorney(s) Marc A Asch to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7626504), filed by Plaintiff Kingebeni Kilaka Kelorde. (Asch, Marc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7626441) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Asch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.