GRAHAM v. CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., A/K/A CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES
| MICHELLE GRAHAM |
| CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., A/K/A CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES |
| 1:2023cv00875 |
| May 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Richard L Young |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) and the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss with prejudice (dkt 8), this case has been CLOSED. TEXT-ONLY: There is no pdf document associated with this entry. (TMD) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice, filed by Plaintiff MICHELLE GRAHAM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Steinkamp, John) |
Filing 7
ORDER - The Court has been advised by counsel that a settlement has been reached in this action. Therefore, all pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences and trial, if any, are VACATED. IT IS ORDERED that within thirty days of this date, counsel for the plaintiff shall file a motion to dismiss this cause or a stipulation of dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/26/2023.(TPS)
|
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by MICHELLE GRAHAM. CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., A/K/A CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES served on 6/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JRB) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., A/K/A CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES. (JRB) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff MICHELLE GRAHAM. (Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., A/K/A CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, filed by MICHELLE GRAHAM. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7641643) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2- The January 4, 2023 and January 26, 2023 dispute letters sent to Defendant, #3 Exhibit 3- Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A- Relevant pages of Plaintiff's March 27, 2023 Experian credit report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GRAHAM v. CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., A/K/A CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHELLE GRAHAM | |
| Represented By: | John Thomas Steinkamp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC., A/K/A CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
