PARSLEY v. MARASCO et al
ANALISE PARSLEY |
ETHAN MARASCO, ERIC MARASCO and ROSIEL MARASCO |
1:2023cv00955 |
May 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
James R Sweeney |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 t Diversity-Torts |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Summons (Alias - Amended) Issued as to ETHAN MARASCO. (DWH) Modified on 6/29/2023 to add additional text (DWH). |
Filing 9 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to ETHAN MARASCO. (Brinkerhoff, William) |
Filing 8 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to ERIC MARASCO, ETHAN MARASCO, ROSIEL MARASCO. (RAGS) (JDC) |
Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JDC) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JDC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by MacKenzie Adair Watson on behalf of Plaintiff ANALISE PARSLEY. (Watson, MacKenzie) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly D. Jeselskis on behalf of Plaintiff ANALISE PARSLEY. (Jeselskis, Kimberly) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by William J. Brinkerhoff on behalf of Plaintiff ANALISE PARSLEY. (Brinkerhoff, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by ANALISE PARSLEY. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7656086) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Brinkerhoff, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.