BOND v. ALPHA PHI ALPHA et al
| LEWIS L. BOND |
| ALPHA PHI ALPHA and RONALD D. STOVALL, JR. |
| 1:2023cv00956 |
| May 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by ALPHA PHI ALPHA, RONALD D. STOVALL, JR. (Caruso, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony J. Caruso on behalf of Defendants ALPHA PHI ALPHA, RONALD D. STOVALL, JR. (Caruso, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 12
AFFIDAVIT in Support of Response in Opposition to Motion re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendants ALPHA PHI ALPHA, RONALD D. STOVALL, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - June 28, 2023 letter and execute Waivers, #2 Exhibit 2 - Federal Express documentation, #3 Exhibit 3 - Correspondence, executed Waivers, Federal Express documentation)(Caruso, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendants ALPHA PHI ALPHA, RONALD D. STOVALL, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Correspondence and Membership Recognition Forms)(Caruso, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiff LEWIS L. BOND. (JDC)
|
|
Filing 9
Mail Returned as undeliverable. #2 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction, #3 NOTICE to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement sent to LEWIS L. BOND. (Return to Sender Attempted Not Known Unable to Forward) (CKM)
|
|
Filing 8
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity Inc. and Ronald D Stovall, JR on May 31, 2023, filed by LEWIS L. BOND. (LF)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Change of Address for LEWIS L. BOND. (LF)
|
|
Filing 6
Mail Returned as RETURN TO SENDER; UNABLE TO FORWARD. #4 Order sent to LEWIS L. BOND at 520 E Washington St., Apt 330, Indianapolis, IN 46204-2611. (JRB)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk sent to (1) Alpha Phi Alpha; and (2) Ronald D. Stovall, Jr. (RAGS) (JDC)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE - The clerk is directed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) to issue process to Defendants Alpha Phi Alpha and Ronald D. Stovall, Jr. in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt. 1, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Order. (Copies mailed pursuant to distribution list). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/2/2023.(JDC)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH)
|
|
Filing 2
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ALPHA PHI ALPHA, RONALD D. STOVALL, JR, filed by LEWIS L. BOND. (Filing fee $402, Receipt Number 5417) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. Constitution and By-Laws 2017, #2 Exhibit B including Memorandum, Envelope, and Certificate, #3 Exhibit C including letter and card, #4 Exhibit D letter, #5 Exhibit E card, online membership information, #6 Exhibit F Chicago State University Student Handbook, #7 Exhibit G email message)(DJH) Modified on 6/1/2023 (Receipt number updated from Manual Receipt Number 17511 issued 5/31 to ACR receipt number written 6/01) (DJH).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
