SMITH v. WEDDELL
JOHN D. SMITH, II |
BRANDON WEDDELL |
1:2023cv00989 |
June 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James R Sweeney |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Final Judgment - The Court now enters final judgment. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/3/2023.(JRB) |
Filing 9 Order Denying Motion to Stay and Dismissing Action - The motion to stay, dkt. #8 , is DENIED. This action is DISMISSSED without prejudice because Mr. Smith's claim is not cognizable under Heck. Final judgment shall now enter. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/3/2023. (JRB) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Stay and response to order Dkt. #5 , filed by Plaintiff JOHN D. SMITH, II. (LF) |
Filing 7 RECEIPT #5729 for Filing fee in the amount of $402.00, paid by John D. Smith. (CCG) |
Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
Filing 5 Order Dismissing Complaint, Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause, and Directing Plaintiff to Pay Filing Fee - Mr. Smith's complaint has been dismissed, but final judgment will not yet issue. Instead, Mr. Smith shall have through July 7, 2023, to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Order should not issue. Mr. Smith also shall have through July 7, 2023, to pay the filing fee for this action or demonstrate his inability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Order. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 6/12/2023.(KAA) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (BRR) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (BRR) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against BRANDON WEDDELL, filed by JOHN D. SMITH, II. (No fee paid with this filing) (BRR) |
Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JOHN D. SMITH, II located at ISP. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JOHN D. SMITH, II to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (BRR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SMITH v. WEDDELL | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JOHN D. SMITH, II | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BRANDON WEDDELL | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.