FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA v. FELIX et al
| FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA |
| PAUL A. FELIX, DONALD LEE BUCKINGHAM, GREGORY GARRISON, KAREN G. MORRIS, DAVID M. MCPHERSON, KATHY KREAG WILLIAMS, TODD ROKITA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, DARREN J. MURPHY and GREGORY MARLOW |
| 1:2023cv01009 |
| June 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Order - The plaintiff has moved for pauper status in this action which was dismissed as frivolous on June 20, 2023. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #12 , is granted to the extent that she is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Sixty-Six Dollars and Twelve Cents ($66.12).1 See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through August 7, 2023, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Because the plaintiff is currently being held at a state hospital pending a competency evaluation, the Court will not issue a collection order to collect the filing fee at this time. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail). Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 7/9/2023. (JDC)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LBT) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COPIES - #8 Motion for Copies is DENIED because this action was dismissed as frivolous on June 20, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/30/2023 (Copy mailed to Plaintiff). (LBT)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH AND POWER OF ATTORNEY by FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(KAA) |
| Filing 9 NON CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
| Filing 8 MOTION Requesting Copies, filed by Plaintiff FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
| Filing 7 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
|
Filing 5
FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court, having this day issued its Order directing the entry of final judgment, now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 6/20/2023.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Screening Complaint and Dismissing Action as Frivolous - This case is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. Final judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 6/20/2023.(JRB)
|
| Filing 6 Submission of Documents, filed by Plaintiff FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DONALD LEE BUCKINGHAM, PAUL A. FELIX, GREGORY GARRISON, GREGORY MARLOW, DAVID M. MCPHERSON, KAREN G. MORRIS, DARREN J. MURPHY, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, TODD ROKITA, KATHY KREAG WILLIAMS, filed by FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits including records from Hamilton County Court, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
