JOHNSTON v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
| William Johnston |
| AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2023cv01035 |
| June 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Mario Garcia |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM JOHNSTON . (Schultz, Michael) |
| Filing 10 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendant AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Taylor, David) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint , filed by AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Dwelling Fire Policy)(Taylor, David) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE , re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM JOHNSTON. (Schultz, Michael) |
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - A Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference is set for 8/14/2023 at 9:00 AM (Eastern Time) before the Honorable Mario Garcia, United States Magistrate Judge. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 6/27/2023. (JSR)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC INITIAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, filed by Defendant AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY (Taylor, David) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard James Proie, Jr on behalf of Defendant AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Proie, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Taylor, David) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David L. Taylor on behalf of Defendant AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Taylor, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION from Marion County Superior Court 2, case number 49D02-2305-PL-018996, filed by AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7677001) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record, #3 Exhibit A - State Court Record (docket, Appearance, Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial, Summons, Appearance, Motion for Enlargement, Order Granting Enlargement), #4 Exhibit B - Complaint and Jury Demand)(Taylor, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSTON v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Johnston | |
| Represented By: | Michael L. Schultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Richard James Proie, Jr |
| Represented By: | David L. Taylor |
| Represented By: | Jerry M. Padgett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
