DAVIS v. HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.
| KAYLEA DAVIS |
| HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD. |
| 1:2023cv01146 |
| June 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Richard L Young |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.. (Kalas, Jennifer) |
Filing 10
INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER - An Initial Pretrial Conference by Zoom is set for 9/13/2023 at 9:30 AM (Eastern Time) before United States Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. The Court will contact counsel by separate email with information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the Court's expectations for the conference. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 8/8/2023. (JSR)
|
| Filing 11 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CKM) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Schultz on behalf of Defendant HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.. (Schultz, David) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.. (Kalas, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Jay Kalas on behalf of Defendant HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD.. (Kalas, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by KAYLEA DAVIS. HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD. served on 7/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Affidavit of Service)(Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JRB) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD. (JRB) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff KAYLEA DAVIS. (Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD., filed by KAYLEA DAVIS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7700431) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2- The May 23, 2022 and May 25, 2022 dispute letters sent to Defendant, #3 Exhibit 3- Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A- Relevant pages of Plaintiff's July 22, 2022 Experian credit report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DAVIS v. HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KAYLEA DAVIS | |
| Represented By: | John Thomas Steinkamp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD. | |
| Represented By: | David M. Schultz |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Jay Kalas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
