REYES v. HENRY SCHEIN, INC.
| MADAI REYES |
| HENRY SCHEIN, INC. |
| 1:2023cv01245 |
| July 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Mario Garcia |
| Crystal S Wildeman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice of Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Crystal S. Wildeman. Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number (1:23-cv-1245-SEB-CSW), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (BRR) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re, filed by Defendant HENRY SCHEIN, INC.. (Doty, Sarah) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - The above case is hereby assigned for an INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2023, at 9:30 a.m., Indianapolis Time (EST), TELEPHONIC, before the Honorable Mario Garcia, United States Magistrate Judge. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 8/14/2023.(JRB)
|
| Filing 10 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by HENRY SCHEIN, INC.. (Mosby, Brian) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Richards Doty on behalf of Defendant HENRY SCHEIN, INC.. (Doty, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Lee Mosby on behalf of Defendant HENRY SCHEIN, INC.. (Mosby, Brian) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service, filed by MADAI REYES. HENRY SCHEIN, INC. served on 8/1/2023. (Wilson, Bradley) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon L. Melton on behalf of Plaintiff MADAI REYES. (Melton, Shannon) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LBT) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to HENRY SCHEIN, INC. (LBT) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley L. Wilson on behalf of Plaintiff MADAI REYES. (Wilson, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against HENRY SCHEIN, INC., filed by MADAI REYES. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7724166) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Wilson, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: REYES v. HENRY SCHEIN, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MADAI REYES | |
| Represented By: | Bradley L. Wilson |
| Represented By: | Shannon L. Melton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HENRY SCHEIN, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Brian Lee Mosby |
| Represented By: | Sarah Richards Doty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
