PEDRAZA PULIDO et al v. REYNOSO et al
| JOSE JESUS PEDRAZA PULIDO, ARACELI CORTEZ, N. C. and J. P. |
| RENE REYNOSO, JR., INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS |
| 1:2023cv01296 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court sua sponte hereby RESCHEDULES the 9/22/2023 Telephonic Status Conference to 9/26/2023 at 12:00 PM (Eastern Time). The parties shall use the call-in information provided on 9/21/2023 (Dkt. 22 ) for this conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 9/22/2023. (GD)
|
| Filing 21 Exhibit List Preliminary, filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR. (Keesler, Kiely) |
| Filing 20 Witness List Preliminary, filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR. (Keesler, Kiely) |
| Filing 19 EXHIBIT Preliminary-Witness Preliminary Lists by All Plaintiffs. (Leerkamp, Randolph) |
|
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore: Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference held on 8/17/2023. Approved Case Management Plan with parties' agreed changes approved by separate order. Telephonic Status Conference set for 9/22/2023 at 4:30 PM (Eastern Time). Settlement Conference set for 11/30/2023 at 9:00 AM (Eastern Time) in room #277, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. *SEE ORDER FOR DEADLINES.* Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. (GD)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS AMENDED. Dispositive Motions due by 4/23/2024. Discovery due by 3/26/2024. *SEE ALL DEADLINES.* Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/17/2023. (GD)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDERS - A motion for the entry of an agreed protective order should be filed as soon as practicable, but in any event no later than 14 days prior to the original due date for any discovery response with regard to which the responding party proposes to rely upon the protective order when responding. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/17/2023.(JRB)
|
| Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR . (Keesler, Kiely) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE , re #8 Order, filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR. (Keesler, Kiely) |
| Filing 12 REDACTION to #6 Answer to Complaint by CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR. (Keesler, Kiely) |
| Filing 11 REDACTION to #1 Notice of Removal for Plaintiffs' Complaint by CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR. (Keesler, Kiely) |
| Filing 10 REDACTION to #1 Notice of Removal for State Court Record by CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR. (Keesler, Kiely) |
| Filing 9 REDACTION to #1 Notice of Removal for the Civil Cover Sheet by CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR. (Keesler, Kiely) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Within 7 days of the date of this Order, Defendants shall file properly redacted versions of each document in the record that includes the minors' names and certify to the Court that they have reviewed the entire record to ensure that no additional occurrences of personal identifiers remain in the public record. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/3/2023. (LF)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: This matter is scheduled for a telephonic initial pretrial conference on Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. (Eastern). Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") no fewer than seven days before the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/3/2023.(JRB)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Dkt. 1.3), filed by CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR.(Keesler, Kiely) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LF) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Regarding State Court Motions, filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR (Keesler, Kiely) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kiely C Keesler on behalf of Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE REYNOSO, JR. (Keesler, Kiely) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D02-2306-CT-023462, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7734622) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record CCS, Complaint, Summons to IMPD, Summons to Reynoso, Jr., Summons filed to IMPD, Appearance for Plaintiffs, Summons to City of Indianapolis, Service Returned Served, Service Returned Served, Appearance for Defendants, Notice of Automatic Extension of Time, Jury Demand, #3 State Court Record Plaintiff's Complaint)(Keesler, Kiely) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
