CROSSLEY v. KIKE et al
ANDREW R. CROSSLEY |
AUSTAN KIKE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY |
1:2023cv01299 |
July 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Kellie M Barr |
James R Sweeney |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 08/11/2023. (AAS) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ANDREW R. CROSSLEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AUSTAN KIKE, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TRICIA PRETORIUS, filed by ANDREW R. CROSSLEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.