MARTIN v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
Plaintiff: JABREEH DAVIS MARTIN
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH, JOHN MERSHON, DAUSS and WEXFORD OF INDIANA
Case Number: 1:2023cv01329
Filed: July 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Kellie M Barr
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING FILING FEE - The Court will permit Mr. Martin one final opportunity, through October 16, 2023, to pay the $402.00 filing fee or to demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and providing his relevant trust account statement. Failure to take either of these actions in this extended time permitted will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning or opportunity to show cause. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 9/18/2023.(JRB)
August 15, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through September 15, 2023, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (JRT)
August 7, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRT)
August 7, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge James Patrick Hanlon and Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. Judge James R. Sweeney II, Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:23-cv-1329-JPH-KMB, on all future filings in this matter. (JRB)
August 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING RELATED CASE - This civil action is related to Cause Number 1:21-cv-03120-JPH-KMB, because both cases arise out of the plaintiffs' alleged exposure to unsafe water at Pendleton Correctional Facility. Pursuant to Local Rule 40-1(e) of the Southern District of Indiana, the clerk is directed to reassign this case to Judge James P. Hanlon and Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/6/2023.(JRB)
July 28, 2023 Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG)
July 28, 2023 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG)
July 25, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CENTURION HEALTH, DAUSS, JOHN MERSHON, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, filed by JABREEH DAVIS MARTIN. (No fee paid with this filing) (CCG)
July 25, 2023 Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JABREEH DAVIS MARTIN located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JABREEH DAVIS MARTIN to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (CCG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MARTIN v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JABREEH DAVIS MARTIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN MERSHON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAUSS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WEXFORD OF INDIANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?