TAYLOR v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT TERRE HAUTE
| LAWRENCE TAYLOR |
| U.S. DISTRICT COURT TERRE HAUTE |
| 1:2023cv01357 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Richard L Young |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #6 Closed Judgment, #5 Order sent to Theodora Minch at 445 North Pennsylvania Street, Suite 605, Indianapolis, IN 46204. (LF) |
| Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT: The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The petition for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is dismissed without prejudice.. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 8/21/2023.(Copies mailed per Distribution list.) (LF) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Mr. Taylor appears to be trying to create an end run around Judge Sweeney's directives in the criminal case, 2:22-cr-00006-JRS-CMM. In that case, Mr. Taylor's pro sedocuments have been repeatedly forwarded, unread, to his counsel. In addition, counsel has been instructed to "remind his client that he should not send letters/documents directly to the Court." Crim. Dkt. 102. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed without prejudice and the clerk is directed to close this case and forward a copy of the petition, dkt. #1 , and this Order to Mr. Taylor's defense counsel in United States v. Taylor, No. 2:22-cr-00006-JRS-CMM, consistent with the distribution portion of this Order. If Mr. Taylor wishes to challenge the conditions he faced while incarcerated at USP Terre Haute, he must file a civil rights lawsuit. The clerk is directed to enclose a blank prisoner civil rights complaint form with Mr. Taylor's copy of this Order, which he may use for such purpose. Judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 8/21/2023.(Copies mailed per Distribution list. (Attachments: #1 Blank Complaint form)(LF)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by LAWRENCE TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LBT) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by LAWRENCE TAYLOR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TAYLOR v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT TERRE HAUTE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: LAWRENCE TAYLOR | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: U.S. DISTRICT COURT TERRE HAUTE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
