ALEXANDER v. AI INNOVATIONS
| LEROY ALEXANDER, JR. |
| AI INNOVATIONS |
| 1:2023cv01389 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Plaintiff LEROY ALEXANDER, JR. (Scott, Michelle) |
| Filing 12 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant AI INNOVATIONS. (Jeter, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant AI INNOVATIONS. (Jeter, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Paul Jeter on behalf of Defendant AI INNOVATIONS. (Jeter, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 RETURN of Service, filed by LEROY ALEXANDER, JR. AI INNOVATIONS served on 8/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return of Service, #2 Exhibit USPS Tracking Delivery - AI Innovations)(Scott, Michelle) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to AI INNOVATIONS. (JSR) |
Filing 7
ORDER - Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Leroy Alexander, Jr.'s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. [Filing No. 3.] 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) permits the Court to authorize a plaintiff to file a lawsuit "without prepayment of fees" if the plaintiff "submits an affidavit" demonstrating that he lacks the assets to pay the filing fee at this time. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Mr. Alexander's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, [ #3 ], meets this standard and is therefore GRANTED. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). See Order for additional information. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/11/2023. (SWM)
|
| Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff LEROY ALEXANDER, JR. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Smith Scott on behalf of Plaintiff, LEROY ALEXANDER, JR. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AI INNOVATIONS, filed by LEROY ALEXANDER, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit 2 Determination and Notice of Rights, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ALEXANDER v. AI INNOVATIONS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LEROY ALEXANDER, JR. | |
| Represented By: | Michelle Smith Scott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AI INNOVATIONS | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Paul Jeter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
