BEADLE v. ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC
| MICHAEL BEADLE |
| ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC |
| 1:2023cv01412 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James R Sweeney |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - Pursuant to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by the Plaintiff in this cause, this cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own respective costs and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, incurred in connection with this cause. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 9/19/2023. (JSR)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL BEADLE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Steinkamp, John) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - The Court has been advised by counsel that a settlement has been reached in this action. Therefore, all pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences and trial, if any, are VACATED. IT IS ORDERED that within twenty-eight days of this date, counsel for the plaintiff shall file a motion to dismiss this cause or a stipulation of dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 9/5/2023.(JRB)
|
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service, filed by MICHAEL BEADLE. ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC served on 8/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Affidavit of Service)(Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (CW) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CW) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CW) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC. (CW) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff MICHAEL BEADLE. (Steinkamp, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC, filed by MICHAEL BEADLE. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7760666) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2- The November 8, 2022 letter sent to Defendant via Facsimile, #3 Exhibit 3- Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A- Relevant pages of Plaintiff's January 9, 2023 Experian Credit Report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BEADLE v. ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHAEL BEADLE | |
| Represented By: | John Thomas Steinkamp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
