DAVIS v. SONIC RESTAURANT
Plaintiff: LATISHA DAVIS
Defendant: SONIC RESTAURANT, JASON and NELL
Case Number: 1:2023cv01429
Filed: August 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mario Garcia
Referring Judge: Richard L Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2023 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JASON, NELL, SONIC RESTAURANT, filed by LATISHA DAVIS.(JRB)
September 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION FOR IFP STATUS AND SCREENING COMPLAINT - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Filing No. #2 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for assistance with recruiting counsel (Filing No. #3 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Jason and Nell are DISMISSED with prejudice. With respect to Defendant Sonic Restaurant, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend her complaint. She shall have through October 3, 2023, to file an amended complaint, or the case will be dismissed with prejudice without further warning. Should Plaintiff file an amended complaint, she should be sure to provide enough facts to present a story that holds together. Legal argument is not necessary. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 9/12/2023. (JRB)
August 21, 2023 Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by LATISHA DAVIS. (LBT)
August 14, 2023 Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH)
August 14, 2023 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
August 14, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff LATISHA DAVIS. (DJH)
August 14, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff LATISHA DAVIS. (DJH)
August 14, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JASON, NELL, SONIC RESTAURANT, filed by LATISHA DAVIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 additional pages to Complaint, #2 Exhibits including Document to Lindsey Williams, Charge of Discrimination, and Determination and Notice of Rights)(DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAVIS v. SONIC RESTAURANT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LATISHA DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SONIC RESTAURANT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JASON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?