EASTERDAY v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC et al
| MISTY EASTERDAY |
| QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC, LaGRANGE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., AKA TRACY HARKER, UNKNOWN QCC EMPLOYEES and UNKNOWN LCSD EMPLOYEES |
| 1:2023cv01458 |
| August 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| The Southern District of Indiana receives email notice from the Clerk of the Northern District of Indiana regarding electronic case transfer. Case transferred from Indiana Southern has been opened in USDC Northern Indiana as case 1:23-cv-00419, filed 09/29/2023. (KAA) |
| Filing 14 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Indiana. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Indiana, on September 26, 2023. (KAA) |
Filing 13
CLOSED TRANSFER to Northern District of Indiana at Fort Wayne, Indiana. Defendant QCC's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, transfer this case based on improper venue, dkt. #9 , is denied as moot. See Order. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/26/2023.(KAA)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , filed by Plaintiff MISTY EASTERDAY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - QCC Consent)(Hayes, Charles) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand , filed by QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC, UNKNOWN QCC EMPLOYEES.(Pierce, Brian) |
| Filing 10 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case , filed by Defendant QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC. (Pierce, Brian) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3), or in the alternative MOTION to Transfer Case , filed by Defendant QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC. (Pierce, Brian) Modified on 9/11/2023 (LBT). |
| Filing 8 MARGINAL ENTRY re Defendant LaGrange County Sheriff Dept's #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - Denied as moot in that this Defendant has filed an answer. [Filing No. #7 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/25/2023. (SWM) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand , filed by LaGRANGE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., AKA TRACY HARKER.(Witte, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to September 21, 2023 (Additional) to Answer, filed by Defendant LaGRANGE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., AKA TRACY HARKER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Defendant LaGrange County Sheriff Dept., aka Tracy Harker's Unopposed Motion for Additional Extension of Time to Answer)(Witte, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LBT) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Mark Witte on behalf of Defendant LaGRANGE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., AKA TRACY HARKER. (Witte, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Superior Court 5, case number 29D05-2307-CT-006502, filed by LaGRANGE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., AKA TRACY HARKER. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7769966) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record State Court Record (Complaint, Appearance, Summons, Appearance, Motion, Order, Appearance, Motion, Order, Appearance, Notice, #2 Supplement Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Witte, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
