CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES v. TOWN OF PENDLETON
| CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES |
| TOWN OF PENDLETON |
| 1:2023cv01499 |
| August 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by TOWN OF PENDLETON.(Emerson, James) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey K. Graham on behalf of Defendant TOWN OF PENDLETON. (Graham, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES . (Craig, Darren) |
Filing 13
INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KELLIE M. BARR - This case is scheduled for an Initial Pretrial Conference by Zoom on October 19, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time), before United States Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. The Court will contact counsel by separate email with information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the Court's expectations for the conference. No fewer than seven days before the IPTC, counsel must file a proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 9/12/2023.(JRB)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant TOWN OF PENDLETON. (Emerson, James) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James Alex Emerson on behalf of Defendant TOWN OF PENDLETON. (Emerson, James) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew L. Hinkle on behalf of Defendant TOWN OF PENDLETON. (Hinkle, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to TOWN OF PENDLETON. (KAA) |
| Filing 8 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (KAA) |
| Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (KAA) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Tom Bedsole on behalf of Plaintiff CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES. (Bedsole, Tom) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia Roman Hass on behalf of Plaintiff CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES. (Roman Hass, Patricia) |
| Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES identifying Corporate Parent CLAYTON HOMES, INC., Other Affiliate BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. for CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES.. (Craig, Darren) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Darren Andrew Craig on behalf of Plaintiff CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES. (Craig, Darren) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TOWN OF PENDLETON, filed by CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. D/B/A ARBOR HOMES. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7777050) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 10-15-2019 Huntzinger Application for Primary Plat Approval, #2 Exhibit 2 2-5-2020 Plan Commission Mtg Minutes - Huntzinger Primary Plat Approval, #3 Exhibit 3 11-13-2019 Plan Commission Mtg Minutes - Impact Fees, #4 Exhibit 4 2021 Impact Fee, #5 Exhibit 5 Impact Fee Ordinance, #6 Exhibit 6 7-8-2021 Town Council Meeting Minutes, #7 Exhibit 7 2023 Fee Schedule, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Proposed Summons)(Craig, Darren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
