CHAMBERS v. GREGSTON
| MICHAEL SCOTT CHAMBERS |
| GREGSTON |
| 1:2023cv01583 |
| September 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Order Granting Motion to Reconsider, Dismissing Complaint, and Providing Opportunity to Show Cause - Mr. Chambers' motion to reconsider the Court's assessment of an initial partial filing fee, dkt. #7 , is granted, and he may proceed in forma pauperis without payment of an initial partial filing fee. Mr. Chambers has through November 2, 2023, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/12/2023. (JRB)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsider Order, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL SCOTT CHAMBERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(CW) |
|
Filing 6
Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Three Dollars and Sixty-Two Cents ($3.62). The plaintiff shall have through October 20, 2023, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/21/2023. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. (JSR)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL SCOTT CHAMBERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(CCG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GREGSTON, filed by MICHAEL SCOTT CHAMBERS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CHAMBERS v. GREGSTON | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHAEL SCOTT CHAMBERS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GREGSTON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
