DELTA FAUCET COMPANY v. WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD
Plaintiff: DELTA FAUCET COMPANY
Defendant: WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD
Case Number: 1:2023cv01633
Filed: September 11, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD. (Mead, John)
November 3, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by John M. Mead on behalf of Defendant WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD. (Mead, John)
October 24, 2023 Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Timothy Wang and Nicholas Najera, attorneys for defendant on October 20, 2023, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Swift, Michael)
October 18, 2023 Filing 12 Summons Issued as to WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD. (LBT)
October 17, 2023 Filing 11 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to All Defendants. (Swift, Michael)
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING SERVICE - IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for order permitting service pursuant4(f)(3) is granted and that Plaintiff is authorized to service process on Defendant by email via Defendant's domestic counsel in the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff additionally provide Defendant's domestic counsel copies of the papers served via domestic over-night courier. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/17/2023. (AAS)
October 16, 2023 Filing 9 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING SERVICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. (f)(3) , filed by Plaintiff DELTA FAUCET COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 277 Patent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Wenzhou's Original 277 Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 - Amazon Brand Registry FAQ, #4 Exhibit 4 - Amazon Patent Eval Express Agreement, #5 Exhibit 5 - Wenzhou's Amended 277 Complaint, #6 Exhibit 6 - Contact Us Ni, Wang & Massand, PPLC, #7 Exhibit 7 - Timothy Wang - Ni, Wang & Massand, #8 Exhibit 8 - Nicholas Najera - Ni, Wang & Massand, #9 Exhibit 9 - Order on Wang and Najera Pro Hac Vice, #10 Exhibit 10 - Wang Electronic Notification Request, #11 Exhibit 11 - Najera Electronic Notification Request, #12 Exhibit Opinion on Motion to Transfer 277 DJ Action, #13 Exhibit 13 - Order Granting Motion to Transfer 277 DJ Action, #14 Exhibit 14 - Petition for IPR 277 Patent (Excerpts), #15 Exhibit 15 - Wenzhou Power of Attorney, #16 Exhibit 16 - June 2023 Emails Between Moustakas and Wang, #17 Exhibit 17 - Moustakas to Timothy Wang Email (September 6, 2023), #18 Exhibit 18 - September 11 2023 Email from Kella to Domestic Counsel, #19 Exhibit 19 - September 14 2023 Email from Kella to Domestic Counsel, #20 Exhibit 20 - September 19 2023 Email from Najera to Kella, #21 Exhibit 21 - Moustakas Declaration)(Swift, Michael)
October 16, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING SERVICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. (f)(3), filed by Plaintiff DELTA FAUCET COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Swift, Michael)
September 12, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Michael A. Swift hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Swift, Michael)
September 12, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Filing in lawsuit sent to Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint with Attachments) (LBT)
September 12, 2023 Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LBT)
September 12, 2023 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT)
September 11, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying MASCO CORPORATION OF INDIANA and MASCO CORPORATION as Corporate Parents of DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, filed by Plaintiff DELTA FAUCET COMPANY. (Swift, Michael) Modified on 9/12/2023 to identify corporate parents (LBT).
September 11, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Swift on behalf of Plaintiff DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation. (Swift, Michael)
September 11, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing Fee of $402 Paid, Tracking Id: AINSDC-7807063) against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent 11,725,369, #2 Exhibit B - Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Swift, Michael) Modified on 9/12/2023 (LBT).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DELTA FAUCET COMPANY v. WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DELTA FAUCET COMPANY
Represented By: Michael A. Swift
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WENZHOU XIN XIN SANITARY WARE CO., LTD
Represented By: John M. Mead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?