MORGAN v. SEVIER
| KARL W. MORGAN |
| MARK SEVIER |
| 1:2023cv01720 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Crystal S Wildeman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - CCS, #2 Exhibit 2 - PCR CCS, #3 Exhibit 3 - PCR Dkt, #4 Exhibit 4 - PCR Notice of Withdrawal, #5 Exhibit 5 - PCR Order Dismissing Appeal, #6 Exhibit 6 - CR-2864 Dkt, #7 Exhibit 7 - CR-2864 Appellant, #8 Exhibit 8 - CR-2864 Appellee, #9 Exhibit 9 - CR-2864 Reply, #10 Exhibit 10 - CR-2864 Memo Decision, #11 Exhibit 11 - CR-2529 Dkt, #12 Exhibit 12 - CR-2529 Order Dismissing Appeal, #13 Exhibit 13 - CR-307 Dkt, #14 Exhibit 14 - CR-307 Order Dismissing Appeal, #15 Exhibit 15 - CR-307 Pet. to Trans.)(Drum, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Jesse R. Drum on behalf of Respondent MARK SEVIER. (Drum, Jesse)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - KARL W. MORGAN's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction/sentence. Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is DENIED because the motion reflects that petitioner is able to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 10/26/2023. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by 11/7/2023. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by 12/18/23. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES) Copy sent to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/17/2023.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge, filed by KARL W. MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SWM)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG)
|
|
Filing 3
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner KARL W. MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(CCG)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by KARL W. MORGAN. (Filing fee $5, receipt number 7055) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(CCG)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MORGAN v. SEVIER | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: KARL W. MORGAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MARK SEVIER | |
| Represented By: | Jesse R. Drum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
