TOOLEY v. SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC.
| DENNIS TOOLEY |
| SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC. |
| 1:2023cv01778 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| M Kendra Klump |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - This case is assigned for an initial pretrial conference by telephone on January 10, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. (Eastern Time), before United States Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. No fewer than seven days before the IPTC, counsel must file a proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 12/7/2023.(JRB)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, filed by SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC..(Layden, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC.. (Layden, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC.. (Layden, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Joseph Layden on behalf of Defendant SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC.. (Layden, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of Service, filed by DENNIS TOOLEY. SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC. served on 10/10/2023. (Mussman, Louis Ivan) |
| Filing 7 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before District Judge Matthew P. Brookman. (AAS) |
| Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (AAS) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC. (AAS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric C. Bohnet on behalf of Plaintiff DENNIS TOOLEY. (Bohnet, Eric) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Louis Ivan Christopher Mussman on behalf of Plaintiff DENNIS TOOLEY. (Mussman, Louis Ivan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC., filed by DENNIS TOOLEY. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7836770) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Mussman, Louis Ivan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TOOLEY v. SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DENNIS TOOLEY | |
| Represented By: | Eric C. Bohnet |
| Represented By: | Louis Ivan Christopher Mussman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SHRI MANGALAMURTI INC. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Joseph Layden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
